Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Æó±¸Àλóäµæ¹ýÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ÀÓÇöõÆ® Àλóäµæ Áõ·Ê

Implant impression using closed mouth impression technique : a case report

±¸°­È¸º¹ÀÀ¿ë°úÇÐÁö 2017³â 33±Ç 3È£ p.223 ~ 229
±è¼Ò¿¬, ±èÁÖÇö, Á¤°æÈ­, ÀüÇý¹Ì, °­Àº¼÷, À±¹ÌÁ¤,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±è¼Ò¿¬ ( Kim So-Yeun ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³º´¿ø Ä¡°úÁø·á¼¾ÅÍ
±èÁÖÇö ( Kim Joo-Hyeun ) - ³ª´®EÄ¡°úÀÇ¿ø
Á¤°æÈ­ ( Jung Kyoung-Hwa ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³º´¿ø Ä¡°úÁø·á¼¾ÅÍ
ÀüÇý¹Ì ( Jeon Hye-Mi ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³º´¿ø Ä¡°úÁø·á¼¾ÅÍ
°­Àº¼÷ ( Kang Eun-Sook ) - ÀÎÁ¦´ëÇб³ ÇØ¿î´ë¹éº´¿ø º¸Ã¶°ú
À±¹ÌÁ¤ ( Yun Mi-Jung ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç

Abstract

´ÜÀÏ Ä¡¾ÆÀÇ ÀλóäµæÀ» À§Çؼ­´Â ¹ÙÀÌÆ® Æ®·¹À̸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Æó±¸Àλó¹ýÀÌ ¼±È£µÈ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ÀÓÇöõÆ® ÀλóäµæÀ» À§Çؼ­´Â ´ÜÀÏÄ¡¿Í ´Ù¼öÄ¡ ±¸ºÐ ¾øÀÌ Æí¾Ç Æ®·¹À̸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ °³±¸Àλó¹ýÀÌ ÁÖ·Î »ç¿ëµÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ¹ÙÀÌÆ® Æ®·¹À̸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ´Â Æó±¸ Àλó¹ýÀº ½Ã°£ÀÌ Àý¾àµÇ°í Àç·á°¡ Àû°Ô µé¸ç, ¸ðÇüÀÇ ±³Çձ⠺ÎÂø ½Ã »óÇÏ¾Ç ¾Ç°£ À§Ä¡ °ü°è ¿ÀÂ÷ ¹ß»ý È®·üÀÌ Àû´Ù. º» Áõ·Ê¿¡¼­´Â 2 °¡Áö Á¾·ùÀÇ Æó±¸Àλó¿ë ÄÚÇÎÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇØ ¹ÙÀÌÆ® Æ®·¹ÀÌ·Î Àλóäµæ ÈÄ ´ÜÀÏ ÀÓÇöõÆ® °íÁ¤¼º º¸Ã¶¹°À» Á¦ÀÛÇÔ¿¡ ÀÖ¾î ¸¸Á·ÇÒ ¸¸ÇÑ °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾î º¸°íÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù.

Closed mouth impression technique by using bite tray is preferred for single tooth impression taking. However, for implant impression taking, open mouth impression technique by using single arch tray is generally used whether it is for single implant or multiple implant. Closed mouth impression technique by using bite tray can save time and materials. It also decreases the chance of error occurrence when a model is mounted on an articulator. In this case report, we tried to show a satisfying result of fabricating single implant fixed prosthodontics after bite tray impression taking by using two different copings for closed mouth impression.

Å°¿öµå

Æó±¸Àλó¹ý; ÀÓÇöõÆ® Àλóäµæ; ¹ÙÀÌÆ® Æ®·¹ÀÌ
closed mouth impression technique; impression implant; bite tray

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI